Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDillon, Anneen_US
dc.contributor.authorGennett, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorParilla, Philipen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlleman, Jeffreyen_US
dc.contributor.authorJones, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHeben, Michaelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-07-19T19:43:16Zen_US
dc.date.available2006-07-19T19:43:16Zen_US
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.identifier.citationNanotubes and Related Materials 633 (2001) A5.2.1-A5.2.6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1850/2179en_US
dc.descriptionArticle may be found at: http://www.mrs.org/s_mrs/bin.asp?CID=2385&DID=54945&DOC=FILE.PDFen_US
dc.description.abstractCarbon single-wall nanotubes (SWNTs) have a variety of unique physical, electronic and mechanical properties. However, the SWNTs must be thoroughly purified if they are to be used in the wide array of projected applications and basic studies. Although numerous purification schemes have been employed in the literature, none of them provides an accurate estimate of the SWNT content in the final materials. Here we describe a simple 3-step purification process coupled to an accurate method for determining SWNT wt.% contents in both the crude and purified samples. We employ a laser vaporization synthesis technique and take care to avoid both forming graphite-encapsulated metal particles and incorporating sputtered target material into the collected soot. It is then possible to employ a dilute nitric acid reflux to digest the metal particles and to functionalize and redistribute the non-nanotube carbon fractions in the soots forming a uniform and reactive coating on the SWNTs. This coating is selectively removed by oxidation in air at 550 ?C. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy (ICPS) are used to evaluate the purity of the material at each step of the process, and illustrate that the crude materials contain 6 wt.% metal and 10-35 wt.% SWNTs. The purified materials are found to be >98 wt.% pure with metal contents of < 1 wt.%. Using the 98 wt.% pure materials as a yardstick, we are able to evaluate the accuracy of several other methods commonly employed in determining nanotube purity levels including transmission and scanning electron microscopies (TEM and SEM) and Raman spectroscopy. We show that determining nanotube contents in various materials requires careful scrutiny and the application of multiple techniques.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Science and the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Hydrogen Program of the Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-AC36-99GO10337.en_US
dc.format.extent26759 bytesen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMaterials Research Society: 2000 Fall Proceedings Symposium A: Nanotubes and Related Materialsen_US
dc.subjectAnalysisen_US
dc.subjectPurityen_US
dc.subjectSingle-wall nanotubesen_US
dc.titleEvaluating the purity of single-wall nanotube materialsen_US
dc.typeAbstracten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record