Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPough, F. Harveyen_US
dc.contributor.authorPreest, Marionen_US
dc.contributor.authorFusari, Margareten_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-08-28T14:58:47Zen_US
dc.date.available2006-08-28T14:58:47Zen_US
dc.date.issued1997-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationOecologia 112N3 (1997) 351-361en_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-1939en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1850/2513en_US
dc.description.abstractFossorial lizards differ in morphology from their surface-dwelling relatives. The Australian sphenomorphine skink genus Ctenotus consists of surface-dwelling species, and is closely related to the genus Lerista, which includes both surface-dwelling and fossorial species. Sand-swimming represents the derived condition and has evolved independently in several lineages of Lerista. The heads of lizards in the two genera differ in shape (blunt snout for Ctenotus versus wedge-shaped for Lerista) and in length relative to the body (approximately 20% of snout-vent length for Ctenotus versus 12% for sand-swimming Lerista). Do these specializations affect the sizes or types of prey that can be consumed by Lerista? We compared prey-handling by Ctenotus and Lerista to correlate morphological differences with differences in prey-handling ability, and to distinguish the effects of snout shape and head length. Feeding trials included three categories of insect prey that the lizards normally eat: soft-bodied larvae (Lepidoptera), hard-bodied larvae (Coleoptera), and roaches (Blatoidea). In comparisons based on the mass of a prey item relative to the mass of a lizard, Lerista had longer handling times for all prey categories and were limited to smaller prey than were Ctenotus. However, when comparisons were based on the length of prey relative to the length of a lizard's head, Lerista ate some elongate prey as fast or faster than did Ctenotus, and both genera successfully swallowed prey more than twice the length of their own head. Thus, the differences in prey-handling performance of Ctenotus and Lerista probably result from the fact that Lerista have a relatively shorter head than Ctenotus. All Lerista species, surface-dwelling and fossorial, have short heads compared to primitive sphenomorphine lizards. Fossorial species of Lerista have elongate trunks, and consequently their heads are shorter in proportion to trunk length than those of surface-dwelling Lerista. However, most fossorial species of Lerista are longer and heavier than any of their surface-dwelling congeners, and the heads of these fossorial species are large relative to the prey they encounter. As a consequence, the diets of large fossorial species of Lerista do not appear to be limited by their morphological specialization for sand-swimming.en_US
dc.format.extent43151 bytesen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer: Oecologiaen_US
dc.subjectEvolutionary ecologyen_US
dc.subjectFeeding behavioren_US
dc.subjectLizardsen_US
dc.titlePrey-handling and the evolutionary ecology of sand-swimming lizards (Lerista?: Scincidae)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420050320


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record