Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMontag, Ethanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-18T16:46:38Zen_US
dc.date.available2006-12-18T16:46:38Zen_US
dc.date.issued2006-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Electronic Imaging 15N1 (2006) 010502-1-3en_US
dc.identifier.issn1017-9909en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1850/3015en_US
dc.descriptionRIT community members may access full-text via RIT Libraries licensed databases: http://library.rit.edu/databases/
dc.description.abstractThe method of paired comparison based on Thurstone’s case V of his law of comparative judgments is often used as a psychophysical method to derive interval scales of perceptual qualities in imaging applications. However, methods for determining confi- dence intervals and critical distances for significant differences have been elusive, leading some to abandon the simple analysis provided by Thurstone’s formulation. Monte Carlo simulations of paired comparison experiments were performed in order to derive an empirical formula for determining error. The results show that the variation in the distribution of experimental results can be well predicted as a function of stimulus number and the number of observations. Using these results, confidence intervals and critical values for comparisons can be made using traditional statistical methods.en_US
dc.format.extent72186 bytesen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInternational Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesvol. 15en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesno. 1en_US
dc.subjectImage processingen_US
dc.subjectMonte Carlo methoden_US
dc.subjectVisual perceptionen_US
dc.titleEmpirical formula for creating error bars for the method of paired comparisonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.2181547


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record