Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJoseph, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorEttlie, John
dc.date.accessioned2008-12-09T14:39:44Z
dc.date.available2008-12-09T14:39:44Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1850/7706
dc.description.abstractNicholas G. Carr, as editor-at-large for the Harvard Business Review, authored the provocative editorial piece "IT Doesn't Matter" (Carr, 2003). He compared the development of information technology with the development of railroad and electrical technologies in that article and concluded that IT had reached its commodity stage. His advice to his readers was to spend less on IT; to follow and not lead; and to focus on vulnerabilities instead of opportunities. As one might expect, a flurry of letters to the editor protesting this point of view followed from some very prominent academics in the IT and MIS fields. Responses to the article pointed out that IT would be a commodity if one chose to view it as such and that management makes the difference between productive and non-productive use of IT (Various, 2003). Succinctly put, when IT productivity is an issue, management matters!en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleIT-supported productivity: paradoxes and resolution in R & Den_US
dc.typeBook Chapteren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record