| dc.contributor.author | Print Industry Center | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-11-13T15:23:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2009-11-13T15:23:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009-06 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1850/10773 | |
| dc.description | RIT Printing Industry Center newsletter | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The primary goal of this month's report, Further Investigation into
the Image Quality Differences Between Digital Print
Technologies and Traditional Offset Lithography (PICRM-
2009-04), by Susan Farnand, was to follow-up on research
conducted in 2007 into the image quality gap between digital
print technologies and offset lithography. The 2007 results
suggested that, for some of the images tested, the prints
provided by digital printers on uncoated cover stock were valued
as highly or even more highly than those printed using offset
lithography. The dependence on the media of the comparative
difference in image quality was one that required further
exploration. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | RIT: College of Imaging Arts and Sciences | en_US |
| dc.subject | Newsletter | en_US |
| dc.title | Ereview | en_US |
| dc.type | Newsletter | en_US |
| dc.title.article | Further Investigation into the Image
Quality Differences Between Digital
and Offset Printing | en_US |
| dc.title.article | 2008-2009 Research Monographs | en_US |
